Premium
Reply
Author(s) -
Novelli A.,
Grati F. R.,
Ballarati L.,
Bernardini L.,
Bizzoco D.,
Camurri L.,
Casalone R.,
Cardarelli L.,
Cavalli P.,
Ciccone R.,
Clementi M.,
Dalprà L.,
Gentile M.,
Gelli G.,
Grammatico P.,
Malacarne M.,
Nardone A. M.,
Pecile V.,
Simoni G.,
Zuffardi O.,
Giardino D.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.202
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1469-0705
pISSN - 0960-7692
DOI - 10.1002/uog.11159
Subject(s) - statement (logic) , position statement , medicine , prenatal screening , prenatal diagnosis , family medicine , law , political science , pregnancy , genetics , biology , fetus
Reply to the comments on our positionstatement from Drs Fiorentino and Baldi and from Dr Leeand colleagues. Their letters focus on several controversialissues regarding the use of chromosomal microarrayanalysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis