Premium
Impact of five selected xenobiotics on isolated ammonium oxidizers and on nitrifying activated sludge
Author(s) -
Dokianakis S. N.,
Kornaros M.,
Lyberatos G.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
environmental toxicology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.813
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1522-7278
pISSN - 1520-4081
DOI - 10.1002/tox.20199
Subject(s) - xenobiotic , chemistry , activated sludge , environmental chemistry , nitrification , biodegradation , ammonium , nitrifying bacteria , phenanthrene , phthalic acid , wastewater , organic chemistry , environmental engineering , nitrogen , enzyme , engineering
Sewage treatment plants (STPs) are usual receptors of xenobiotic compounds that have to be cotreated with municipal wastewaters before being discharged to the water environment. The presence of organic contaminants, such as surfactants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalates, and their primary degradation products in the influents of STPs may inhibit irreversibly sensitive biological processes, such as nitrification. The first step of nitrification, i.e., the oxidation of ammonium to nitrite (nitritification), is particularly sensitive. Inhibition of this step under uncontrolled conditions may completely inhibit biological nitrogen removal. The aim of this work was to study the possible inhibitory effect of five selected xenobiotics on (a) a mixed culture of ammonium‐oxidizing bacteria isolated from activated sludge and (b) nitrifying activated sludge directly. The xenobiotics that were tested include nonylphenols (NP), nonylphenolethoxylates (NPEO), linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS), di(2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), as a representative phthalate ester, and the PAH phenanthrene. Remarkable inhibitory effects for all tested compounds were observed in this study even at xenobiotic concentrations as low as 1 mg/L. The observed inhibition of xenobiotics on nitrifying activated sludge was less pronounced, because of the masking effect exerted by the sludge flocs, but was still significant for many of the tested substances at concentrations up to 10 mg/L. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 21: 310–316, 2006.