Premium
Rigor or Restriction: Examining Close Reading With High School English Language Learners
Author(s) -
Thomason Betty,
Brown Clara Lee,
Ward Natalia
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
tesol journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.468
H-Index - 14
eISSN - 1949-3533
pISSN - 1056-7941
DOI - 10.1002/tesj.308
Subject(s) - reading (process) , reading comprehension , curriculum , mathematics education , language arts , psychology , class (philosophy) , task (project management) , comprehension , standardized test , pedagogy , linguistics , computer science , philosophy , management , artificial intelligence , economics
English language learners ( ELL s) are the fastest growing student subgroup in the United States, and public schools have the challenging task of teaching ELL s both English language and academic content. In spite of the attention given to improving outcomes for ELL s, the achievement gap between ELL s and native English speakers persists, especially in reading. Currently, 43 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards ( CCSS ; National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, [, 2010]) for language arts and English curriculum (Achieve, 2013). To address achievement gaps in reading, CCSS recommend a close reading procedure that involves repeated readings of a single complex text to increase student reading comprehension of expository texts. In this pilot study, the researchers examined the appropriateness of close reading procedures prescribed by CCSS for ELL s. Six high school ELL s participated in two units of study in an English as a second language U.S. history class that implemented close reading procedures. The researchers found no evidence of either improved reading comprehension or U.S. history content knowledge. The participants also reported a loss of motivation to read after participating in close reading.