Premium
Incorporation of resident macrophages in engineered tissues: Multiple cell type response to microenvironment controlled macrophage‐laden gelatine hydrogels
Author(s) -
Dollinger Camille,
Ciftci Sait,
KnopfMarques Helena,
Guner Rabia,
Ghaemmaghami Amir M.,
Debry Christian,
Barthes Julien,
Vraihal Engin
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.835
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-7005
pISSN - 1932-6254
DOI - 10.1002/term.2458
Subject(s) - microbiology and biotechnology , self healing hydrogels , macrophage , chemistry , immune system , inflammation , tissue engineering , secretion , wound healing , immunology , in vitro , biology , biomedical engineering , medicine , biochemistry , organic chemistry
The success of tissue engineering strategy is strongly related to the inflammatory response, mainly through the activity of macrophages that are key cells in initial immune response to implants. For engineered tissues, the presence of resident macrophages can be beneficial for maintenance of homeostasis and healing. Thus, incorporation of macrophages in engineered tissues can facilitate the integration upon implantation. In this study, an in‐vitro model of interaction was developed between encapsulated naive monocytes, macrophages induced with M1/M2 stimulation and incoming cells for immune assisted tissue engineering applications. To mimic the wound healing cascade, naive THP‐1 monocytes, endothelial cells and fibroblasts were seeded on the gels as incoming cells. The interaction was first monitored in the absence of the gels. To mimic resident macrophages, THP‐1 cells were encapsulated in the presence or absence of IL‐4 to control their phenotype and then these hydrogels were seeded with incoming cells. Without encapsulation, activated macrophages induce apoptosis in endothelial cells. Once encapsulated no adverse effects were seen. Macrophage‐laden hydrogels attracted more endothelial cells and fibroblasts compared to monocytes‐laden hydrogels. The induction (M2 stimulation) of encapsulated macrophages did not change the overall number of attracted cells; but significantly affected their morphology. M1 stimulation by a defined media resulted in more secretion of both pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory cytokines compared to M2 stimulation. It was demonstrated that there is a distinct effect of encapsulated macrophages on the behaviour of the incoming cells; this effect can be harnessed to establish a microenvironment more prone to regeneration upon implantation.