Premium
An analysis of research studies in which “homemade” achievement instruments were utilized
Author(s) -
Hastings Jean,
Stewart James
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
journal of research in science teaching
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.067
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1098-2736
pISSN - 0022-4308
DOI - 10.1002/tea.3660200710
Subject(s) - test (biology) , mathematics education , quality (philosophy) , educational research , psychology , student achievement , reliability (semiconductor) , achievement test , science education , academic achievement , standardized test , philosophy , power (physics) , physics , epistemology , quantum mechanics , biology , paleontology
This article will have as its focus a problem described by Anderson, namely, the quality of the construction and reporting of research that contains “homemade” achievement tests. The current status of homemade achievement tests was examined in this study. Research reports in two science education journals were analyzed, using Anderson's eight categories of information that a high quality research report should include. The journals examined were Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Science Education from January 1975 to January 1980. The findings indicate that reliability estimates and the procedures for selecting test items were mentioned more frequently in the science education journals than in Anderson's study. However, there was little or no improvement in describing the relation of test items to instruction. These findings should be of interest both to researchers who are utilizing “homemade” achievement tests in their studies and to journal panels who are reviewing studies for publication.