z-logo
Premium
CMMI SM —The evolution continues!
Author(s) -
Curtis Pamela,
Michael Phillips David,
Weszka Joan
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
systems engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.474
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1520-6858
pISSN - 1098-1241
DOI - 10.1002/sys.10014
Subject(s) - capability maturity model integration , leancmmi , capability maturity model , systems engineering , maturity (psychological) , quality (philosophy) , suite , engineering , software engineering , software quality , computer science , software , software development process , manufacturing engineering , software development , operating system , psychology , history , developmental psychology , philosophy , archaeology , epistemology
With Capability Maturity Model ® Integration SM (CMMI SM ), we have a new era of process improvement products that enable us to produce complex, software‐intensive systems of higher quality, in less time, and within expected costs—repeatably. You have likely had the opportunity to work with one of the predecessor models used to construct the CMMI framework. You may have experience with INCOSE's Systems Engineering Capability and Assessment Method (SECAM), or the follow‐on Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA) Interim Standard (EIA/IS) 731, or the Capability Maturity Model ® (CMM ® ) for Software (SW − CMM ® ) if your products required extensive software development. Or you may be new to the use of these models and simply considering how the CMMI SM Product Suite can best be positioned to aid your organization in achieving world‐class quality and reduced cost and time to market for your engineering products and services. The purpose of this paper is to describe the evolution and emergence of the CMMI SM Product Suite. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 5: 7–18, 2002; DOI 10.1002/sys.10014

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here