EIA IS 731 compared to CMMI SM ‐SE/SW | Zendy

Minnich Ilene | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

EIA IS 731 compared to CMMI SM ‐SE/SW

Author(s) -

Minnich Ilene

Publication year - 2002

Publication title -

systems engineering

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.474

H-Index - 50

eISSN - 1520-6858

pISSN - 1098-1241

DOI - 10.1002/sys.10013

Subject(s) - capability maturity model integration , leancmmi , maturity (psychological) , interim , systems engineering , capability maturity model , engineering , software engineering , engineering management , manufacturing engineering , computer science , software , software development process , software development , operating system , psychology , developmental psychology , archaeology , history

This paper provides the reader with a high‐level comparison between the Electronic Industries Association (EIA) Interim Standard (IS) 731, the Systems Engineering Capability Model (SECM) [G47 Systems Engineering Committee, 1999], and the Capability Maturity Model Integration SM (CMMI SM ) for Systems Engineering (SE) and Software Engineering (SW) [CMMI SM Product Development Team, 2000a]. A brief background of the SECM and its contents is provided, followed by a comparison of Focus Areas of the SECM to Process Areas of the CMMI SM . Also compared are the Capability Levels and Generic Practices of the two models, and the scoring rules associated with the two respective appraisal methods. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 5: 62–72, 2002; DOI 10.1002/sys.10013

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research