Premium
Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine
Author(s) -
Hooks M. Stacy,
Jones Graham H.,
Smith Amanda D.,
Neill Darryl B.,
Justice Joseph B.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
synapse
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.809
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1098-2396
pISSN - 0887-4476
DOI - 10.1002/syn.890090206
Subject(s) - nucleus accumbens , dopamine , dopaminergic , locomotor activity , microdialysis , novelty , striatum , neuroscience , medicine , psychology , endocrinology , pharmacology , chemistry , social psychology
The relationship between a rat's locomotor response to a novel environment and its behavioral and dopaminergic responses to cocaine was examined. Subjects were divided into two groups based on their locomotor response to a novel environment. Subjects who had a novelty response above the median were classified as high responders (HR), while those with a novelty response below the median were classified as low responders (LR). Following administration of cocaine‐HC1 (0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, or 15.0 mg/kg), HR rats showed a greater locomotor response than LR rats. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between a subject's locomotor response to the novel environment and the locomotor response to either 10.0 (r = 0.65) or 15.0 (r = 0.92) mg/kg cocaine. In a separate experiment, the extracellular concentration of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (NACC) was monitored using microdialysis procedures. Following cocaine administration (15.0 mg/kg) HR rats showed a larger NACC dopamine response and greater locomotor activity than LR rats. In addition, there was a threefold greater locomotor activity to dopamine ratio in HR rats than in LR rats. A correlation between a subject's locomotor response to a novel environment and the dopaminergic response to cocaine was also evident. These results suggest that differences in the locomotor response to cocaine can, to some degree, be predicted by a rat's locomotor response to a novel environment, and that variations in dopamine‐dependent mechanisms of the NACC may underlie these individual differences.