Premium
Reference tissue models in the assessment of 11 C‐DTBZ binding to the VMAT2 in rat striatum: A test‐retest reproducibility study
Author(s) -
AvendañoEstrada Arturo,
ÁvilaRodríguez Miguel Angel
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
synapse
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.809
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1098-2396
pISSN - 0887-4476
DOI - 10.1002/syn.22029
Subject(s) - reproducibility , striatum , multilinear map , binding potential , chemistry , repeatability , interclass correlation , nuclear medicine , dopaminergic , intraclass correlation , medicine , dopamine , mathematics , positron emission tomography , chromatography , pure mathematics
Dopaminergic PET imaging is a useful tool to assess the dopaminergic integrity and to follow‐up longitudinal studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of different reference tissue‐based methods to determine the non‐displaceable binding potential (BP ND ) as a quantitative measure of 11 C‐DTBZ binding to the VMAT2 in rat striatum using cerebellum as reference region. Eight healthy Wistar rats underwent two microPET scans at the age of 12 (test) and 20 weeks (retest). BP ND was determined using the simplified reference tissue model, Logan reference tissue model, and multilinear reference tissue models (MRTMo and MRTM2). Additionally, a striatal‐to‐cerebellar‐ratio (SCR) analysis was performed. The reproducibility between the two scans was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the variability index. Repeatability indices showed acceptable ICC = 0.66 (SCR) to excellent ICC = 0.98 (MRTM2) reliability for this study and a variability ranging from 12.26% (SCR) to 3.28% (MRTM2). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on longitudinal studies for 11 C‐DTBZ in rats using reference tissue methods. Excellent intersubject and intrasubject reproducibility was obtained with the multilinear reference MRTM2, suggesting this as the best method to compare longitudinal studies, whereas the SCR method had poor reliability. Logan method, however, is a method simple to compute that shows accurate reproducibility with a reasonable level of inter‐ and intra‐subject variability allowing crossover studies to follow‐up the uptake of 11 C‐DTBZ in rat striatum.