Premium
Catching Babies in Prohibition States: Midwives' Accounts for an Illegal Profession
Author(s) -
Suarez Alicia,
Bolton Megan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
symbolic interaction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.874
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1533-8665
pISSN - 0195-6086
DOI - 10.1002/symb.339
Subject(s) - denial , criminology , sociology , nurse midwives , political science , law , psychology , obstetrics , nursing , medicine , pregnancy , psychoanalysis , biology , genetics
Practicing midwifery is illegal in four states and the District of Columbia. However, midwives still practice as they and much of the public do not see their behavior as criminal. Based on in‐depth interviews with twenty‐six midwives, our findings demonstrate that midwives employed both public and professional accounts. They collectively justified midwifery in prohibition states by condemning their condemners, appealing to higher loyalties, denying injury, and justifying by comparison. We also found a new account, denial of illegality. This research uniquely applies the concept of collective accounts to an illegal but socially acceptable career.