z-logo
Premium
Specification guidelines to avoid the state space explosion problem
Author(s) -
Groote Jan Friso,
Kouters Tim W.D.M.,
Osaiweran Ammar
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
software testing, verification and reliability
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.216
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1099-1689
pISSN - 0960-0833
DOI - 10.1002/stvr.1536
Subject(s) - correctness , state space , state (computer science) , computer science , space (punctuation) , guideline , realm , operations research , mathematics , algorithm , law , political science , statistics , operating system
SUMMARY During the last two decades, we modelled the behaviour of a large number of systems. We noted that different styles of modelling had quite an effect on the size of the state spaces of the modelled systems. The differences were so substantial that some specification styles led to far too many states to verify the correctness of the model, whereas with other styles, the number of states was so small that verification was a straightforward activity. In this article, we summarize our experience by providing seven specification guidelines to keep state spaces small. For each guideline, we provide an application, generally from the realm of traffic light controllers, for which we provide a ‘bad’ model with a large state space, and a ‘good’ model with a small state space. The good and bad models are both suitable for their purpose but are not behaviourally equivalent. For all guidelines, we discuss circumstances under which it is reasonable to apply the guidelines. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here