Open Access
Multifactorial Experimental Design to Optimize the Anti‐Inflammatory and Proangiogenic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Spheroids
Author(s) -
Murphy Kaitlin C.,
Whitehead Jacklyn,
Falahee Patrick C.,
Zhou Dejie,
Simon Scott I.,
Leach J. Kent
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
stem cells
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.159
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 1549-4918
pISSN - 1066-5099
DOI - 10.1002/stem.2606
Subject(s) - spheroid , mesenchymal stem cell , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , oxygen tension , stem cell , cell , inflammation , prostaglandin e2 , immunology , cell culture , cancer research , chemistry , endocrinology , oxygen , biochemistry , organic chemistry , genetics
Abstract Mesenchymal stem cell therapies promote wound healing by manipulating the local environment to enhance the function of host cells. Aggregation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into three‐dimensional spheroids increases cell survival and augments their anti‐inflammatory and proangiogenic potential, yet there is no consensus on the preferred conditions for maximizing spheroid function in this application. The objective of this study was to optimize conditions for forming MSC spheroids that simultaneously enhance their anti‐inflammatory and proangiogenic nature. We applied a design of experiments (DOE) approach to determine the interaction between three input variables (number of cells per spheroid, oxygen tension, and inflammatory stimulus) on MSC spheroids by quantifying secretion of prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), two potent molecules in the MSC secretome. DOE results revealed that MSC spheroids formed with 40,000 cells per spheroid in 1% oxygen with an inflammatory stimulus (Spheroid 1) would exhibit enhanced PGE 2 and VEGF production versus those formed with 10,000 cells per spheroid in 21% oxygen with no inflammatory stimulus (Spheroid 2). Compared to Spheroid 2, Spheroid 1 produced fivefold more PGE 2 and fourfold more VEGF, providing the opportunity to simultaneously upregulate the secretion of these factors from the same spheroid. The spheroids induced macrophage polarization, sprout formation with endothelial cells, and keratinocyte migration in a human skin equivalent model—demonstrating efficacy on three key cell types that are dysfunctional in chronic non‐healing wounds. We conclude that DOE‐based analysis effectively identifies optimal culture conditions to enhance the anti‐inflammatory and proangiogenic potential of MSC spheroids. S tem C ells 2017;35:1493–1504