z-logo
Premium
A multi‐reference‐based mode selection approach for the implementation of NExT–ERA in modal‐based damage detection
Author(s) -
Mahmood S M Faisal,
Haritos Nicholas,
Gad Emad,
Zhang Lihai
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
structural control and health monitoring
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.587
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1545-2263
pISSN - 1545-2255
DOI - 10.1002/stc.1638
Subject(s) - modal , benchmark (surveying) , process (computing) , identification (biology) , computer science , vibration , reference frame , mode (computer interface) , algorithm , modal analysis , realization (probability) , structural health monitoring , operational modal analysis , normal mode , channel (broadcasting) , frame (networking) , engineering , structural engineering , mathematics , acoustics , finite element method , telecommunications , physics , operating system , polymer chemistry , chemistry , biology , geodesy , statistics , botany , geography
SUMMARY A modal‐based global method for identification, localization and quantification of damage of a shear frame structure is presented in this paper. The method involves identification of modal parameters from the vibration responses of the structure only (output only) using a combination of natural excitation technique (NExT) and eigensystem realization algorithm (ERA), and determination of stiffness parameters using very few identified modes by employing a least squares solution procedure. Finally, damage is indicated by comparing the stiffnesses of the (possibly) damaged structure with that of the undamaged structure. The implementation of NExT–ERA requires a reference channel for modal identification, but several limitations of using a single reference channel have been identified from the investigations of this study. To overcome the limitations, a new approach called multi‐reference‐based mode selection is proposed in this paper. The approach makes use of all the available DOFs, but one at a time, as reference channels and identifies the best representative modes of the structure by a mode screening process and a mode separation process. The approach is also automated for expediency and possible real‐time application. The presented damage detection methodology is implemented on the analytical phase I and experimental phase II of the IASC‐ASCE SHM benchmark problem and shows an accuracy of around 90% in damage detection. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom