z-logo
Premium
Non‐Metallic Inclusion Behaviors in a New Tundish and SEN Design Using a Swirling Flow during Continuous Casting of Steel
Author(s) -
Ni Peiyuan,
Jonsson Lage Tord Ingemar,
Ersson Mikael,
Jönsson Pär Göran
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
steel research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.603
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1869-344X
pISSN - 1611-3683
DOI - 10.1002/srin.201600155
Subject(s) - tundish , materials science , mechanics , continuous casting , flow (mathematics) , centripetal force , non metallic inclusions , inclusion (mineral) , metallurgy , slag (welding) , buoyancy , physics , thermodynamics
The behaviors of non‐metallic inclusions in a new tundish and SEN design enabling a swirling flow are investigated by using a Lagrangian particle tracking scheme. The results show that 99% of both Al 2 O 3 and Ce 2 O 3 inclusions are removed from both the top surface and the other tundish walls with a “trap” boundary condition, while only around 60% are removed from the top surface of tundish for a “reflect” boundary condition at the other tundish walls. Large size non‐metallic inclusions of different densities show a large difference under a “reflect” boundary condition at tundish walls, due to a high buoyancy of light inclusions. In the swirling flow SEN, a much smaller number of large Al 2 O 3 inclusions touches the wall compared to Ce 2 O 3 inclusions. This is due to that they have larger deviations from the steel flow path compared to heavy Ce 2 O 3 inclusions, due to the centripetal force. For small size inclusions, the centripetal separation is not effective neither for the light Al 2 O 3 inclusions nor for the heavy Ce 2 O 3 inclusions in the current swirling flow SEN with a swirl number of 0.4. Light Al 2 O 3 inclusions larger than 40 µm can be influenced by the current centripetal force.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here