Premium
Grain boundary segregation of antimony in iron base alloys and its effect on toughness
Author(s) -
Mast Ralph,
Viefhaus Helmut,
Grabke Hans Jürgen
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
steel research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1869-344X
pISSN - 0177-4832
DOI - 10.1002/srin.199905633
Subject(s) - grain boundary , antimony , materials science , metallurgy , intergranular corrosion , auger electron spectroscopy , ingot , enthalpy , analytical chemistry (journal) , thermodynamics , microstructure , chemistry , alloy , chromatography , nuclear physics , physics
The equilibrium grain boundary segregation of antimony was investigated in iron base alloys (Fe‐Sb, Fe‐C‐Sb, Fe‐Ni‐Sb) after annealing at temperatures between 550 and 750°C. Utilizing Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) the concentration of antimony at intergranular fracture faces was determined as a function of bulk concentration and equilibration temperature. The segregation of antimony in Fe‐Sb alloys with mass contents of between 0.012 and 0.094 % Sb was described by the Langmuir‐McLean equation. The evaluation leads to the free enthalpy of segregation Δ G segr = −19 kJ/mol ‐ T 28 J/mol K. The relatively low value for the segregation enthalpy Δ H = −19 kJ/mol indicates a rather small tendency for grain boundary segregation of Sb. However, its embrittling effect is strong, scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of fractured samples show that the percentage of intergranular fracture strongly increases with an increasing coverage of antimony at the grain boundaries. The data for Fe‐0.93% Sb and Fe.1.91% Sb (mass contents) do not fit in the thermodynamic evaluation obviously due to formation of antimonide precipitates in the grain boundaries. The addition of carbon to Fe‐Sb alloys results in a higher grain boundary cohesion which is caused by two effects of carbon, displacement of antimony from the grain boundaries by carbon and enhanced grain boundary cohesion. In the Fe‐Ni‐Sb alloys additional segregation of nickel was found at the grain boundaries but no enhanced antimony segregation, as expected from previous models of other authors, assuming Ni‐Sb cosegregation.