z-logo
Premium
On the ‘Social Sin’ of Political Analysis: A Critical Quantitative Approach from a Systemic Perspective
Author(s) -
ParraLuna Francisco
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
systems research and behavioral science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.371
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1099-1743
pISSN - 1092-7026
DOI - 10.1002/sres.2236
Subject(s) - politics , perspective (graphical) , political system , positive economics , relation (database) , sociology , quantitative analysis (chemistry) , epistemology , social system , social psychology , economics , political science , social science , psychology , law , philosophy , computer science , data mining , chromatography , artificial intelligence , democracy , chemistry
What is a political system? An organizational ‘instrument’ to satisfy the objective and subjective needs of people. How to operate it? By optimizing the relation T  =  Y / X where ‘ Y ’ is the ‘system of values’ produced and ‘ X ’ the means employed. Why does political science ignore this crucial relationship? Because it admits three historical fallacies: (i)it is not possible to know what values are produced by political systems; (ii) even if these were known, no valid quantitative date are available; and (iii) even if data were available, it is not possible to express ‘ T ’ as an integrated index. Three fallacies to show that most political analysis could be committing a grave social ‘sin’ because they scorn, systematically, the only thing the voters are looking for. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom