z-logo
Premium
From Second‐order Cybernetics to Enactive Cognitive Science: Varela's Turn From Epistemology to Phenomenology
Author(s) -
Froese Tom
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
systems research and behavioral science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.371
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1099-1743
pISSN - 1092-7026
DOI - 10.1002/sres.1116
Subject(s) - autopoiesis , neurophenomenology , enactivism , cybernetics , epistemology , phenomenology (philosophy) , cognitive science , embodied cognition , cognition , evolutionary epistemology , experiential learning , psychology , philosophy , sociology , mathematics education , neuroscience
Varela is well known in the systems sciences for his work on second‐order cybernetics, biology of cognition and especially autopoietic theory. His concern during this period was to find an appropriate epistemological foundation for the self‐reference inherent in life and mind. In his later years, Varela began to develop the so‐called ‘enactive’ approach to cognitive science, which sets itself apart from other sciences by promoting a careful consideration of concrete experiential insights. His final efforts were thus dedicated to finding a pragmatic phenomenological foundation for life and mind. It is argued that Varela's experiential turn—from epistemology to phenomenology—can be seen as a natural progression that builds on many ideas that were already implicit in second‐order cybernetics and biology of cognition. It is also suggested that the rigorous study of conscious experience may enable us to refine our theories and systemic concepts of life, mind and sociality. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here