Premium
“The Canary in the Coal Mine…” A cautionary tale from the decline of SourceForge
Author(s) -
Tamburri Damian Andrew,
Blincoe Kelly,
Palomba Fabio,
Kazman Rick
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
software: practice and experience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.437
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1097-024X
pISSN - 0038-0644
DOI - 10.1002/spe.2874
Subject(s) - demise , sociotechnical system , context (archaeology) , vitality , software , computer science , sociology , data science , history , political science , knowledge management , archaeology , law , philosophy , theology , programming language
Summary Forges are online collaborative platforms to support the development of distributed open source software. While once mighty keepers of open source vitality, software forges are rapidly becoming less and less relevant. For example, of the top 10 forges in 2011, only one survives today— SourceForge —the biggest of them all, but its numbers are dropping and its community is tenuous at best. Through mixed‐methods research, this article chronicles and analyze the software practice and experiences of the project's history—in particular its architectural and community/organizational decisions. We discovered a number of suboptimal social and architectural decisions and circumstances that, may have led to SourceForge 's demise. In addition, we found evidence suggesting that the impact of such decisions could have been monitored, reduced, and possibly avoided altogether. The use of sociotechnical insights needs to become a basic set of design and software/organization monitoring principles that tell a cautionary tale on what to measure and what not to do in the context of large‐scale software forge and community design and management.