Premium
Chief sustainability officers and corporate social (Ir)responsibility
Author(s) -
Fu Ruchunyi,
Tang Yi,
Chen Guoli
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
strategic management journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 11.035
H-Index - 286
eISSN - 1097-0266
pISSN - 0143-2095
DOI - 10.1002/smj.3113
Subject(s) - officer , sustainability , corporate social responsibility , corporate governance , business , social responsibility , perspective (graphical) , accounting , sample (material) , chief executive officer , social sustainability , corporate sustainability , marketing , public relations , industrial organization , management , economics , finance , political science , law , ecology , biology , chemistry , chromatography , artificial intelligence , computer science
Research Summary How will a chief sustainability officer (CSO) influence corporate social performance? Building upon the upper echelons perspective and the attention‐based view, this study argues that while a CSO helps channel managerial attention to a firm's social domain, managerial attention is more likely to be directed to negative issues than to positive issues. In addition, such relationships are contingent on the focal firm's governance design and its industry culpability. Analysis of a sample of S&P 500 firms for the period of 2005–2014 largely renders support to our predictions. Managerial Summary While more and more firms start to put a chief sustainability officer (CSO) on its top management team (TMT), the implications for corporate social performance of CSO presence remain unclear. With a sample of S&P 500 firms, we find that the presence of a CSO increases the firm's socially responsible activities (CSR) and reduces its socially irresponsible activities (CSiR). Moreover, CSO presence has a greater effect on reducing CSiR than on increasing CSR. These relationships become stronger when the firm has a sustainability committee on the board and is in a culpable industry.