Premium
Is family leadership always beneficial?
Author(s) -
Miller Danny,
Minichilli Alessandro,
Corbetta Guido
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
strategic management journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 11.035
H-Index - 286
eISSN - 1097-0266
pISSN - 0143-2095
DOI - 10.1002/smj.2024
Subject(s) - stewardship theory , blame , stewardship (theology) , business , agency (philosophy) , principal–agent problem , industrial organization , accounting , finance , corporate governance , sociology , law , political science , psychology , social psychology , social science , politics
There has been much debate concerning the performance of family firms and the drivers of their performance. Some scholars have argued that family management is to blame when family firms go wrong; others claim that family management removes costly agency problems and encourages stewardship. Our thesis is that these disagreements can only be resolved by distinguishing among different types of family firms. We argue that family CEOs will outperform in smaller firms with more concentrated ownership and underperform in larger firms with more dispersed ownership; they will do neither where firms are smaller and ownership is more dispersed or firms are larger and ownership is more concentrated. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.