z-logo
Premium
Antioxidant Efficacy of Natural Ubiquinol Compared to Synthetic References – In Vitro Study
Author(s) -
Ácsová Aneta,
Hojerová Jarmila,
Tobolková Blanka,
Martiniaková Silvia
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
chemistryselect
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.437
H-Index - 34
ISSN - 2365-6549
DOI - 10.1002/slct.202100315
Subject(s) - gallic acid , abts , ubiquinol , antioxidant , dpph , chemistry , coenzyme q10 , biochemistry , food science , organic chemistry , coenzyme q – cytochrome c reductase , cytochrome c , mitochondrion
There are many studies dealing with the oxidized form (Ubiquinone) of coenzyme Q10, but only a little of its reduced form (Ubiquinol). Two yeast‐based Ubiquinols (UQH 2 _S, Sigma‐Aldrich; UQH 2 _K, Kaneka) were investigated for in vitro antioxidant efficacy compared to synthetic antioxidants. The antioxidant efficacy of UQH2_S and UQH2_K by the 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl’ (DPPH) assay as well as by the 2,2’‐azino‐bis(3‐ethylbenzthiazoline‐6‐sulfonic) acid’ (ABTS) assay was almost identical (IC50 DPPH/ABTS 0.387/0.226–0.219 mM, respectively). The values were higher (p<0.05) than that of α‐tocopherol, Gallic acid, Butylhydroxyanisole, Butylhydroxytoluene. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power’ values for Ubiquinols (0.05–0.3 mM) were higher (p<0.05) than for the other antioxidants, except Gallic acid. According to the Electron paramagnetic resonance assay, the antioxidant activity of α‐tocopherol/UQH 2 _S mixture was higher compared to the individual antioxidant only in specific combinations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom