z-logo
Premium
Thin Chemisorbed Polyaniline Film on Cobalt Oxide as an Electrode for Hybrid Energy Storage Devices
Author(s) -
Izwan Mis Izan,
Krishnan Syam G.,
Jose Rajan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
chemistryselect
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.437
H-Index - 34
ISSN - 2365-6549
DOI - 10.1002/slct.202001879
Subject(s) - supercapacitor , materials science , polyaniline , electrode , cobalt oxide , electrolyte , energy storage , electrochemistry , chemical engineering , mesoporous material , battery (electricity) , oxide , nanotechnology , polymer , composite material , chemistry , organic chemistry , physics , catalysis , quantum mechanics , engineering , metallurgy , polymerization , power (physics)
Electrical charge storing electrodes and their surface modification are intensively investigated to improve the charge storability indicators in electrochemical energy storage devices. Here, the effects of a thin chemisorbed polyaniline (PANI) film on the charge storage behavior of rod‐shaped spinal‐type cobalt oxide (Co 3 O 4 ) nanorods (PANI@Co 3 O 4 ) are detailed for fabrication of battery–supercapacitor hybrid (BSH) devices. The PANI@Co 3 O 4 showed larger surface area and optimum porosity properties, which contributed to ∼50 % enhanced specific charge than that in the Co 3 O 4 . The deconvoluted total charge storage gain showed more contribution to the bulk‐diffusion controlled process (battery‐type), lower ion transport resistance and Warburg impedance in the PANI@Co 3 O 4 electrode than that in the Co 3 O 4 . Two‐sets of BSH devices are fabricated using PANI@Co 3 O 4 as a positive electrode and mesoporous carbon (MC) and activated carbon (AC) negative electrodes in an aqueous electrolyte and benchmarked with symmetric supercapacitors fabricated using the two carbons. The PANI@Co 3 O 4 //MC device showed nearly two‐fold higher specific energy ( E S ) than that of PANI@Co 3 O 4 //AC. Interestingly, AC//AC symmetric supercapacitors showed two‐fold higher E S than the MC//MC device. Origin of differences in the charge storage behavior of the two types of devices are systematically analyzed and reported.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here