z-logo
Premium
Palladium‐Catalyzed O‐Arylation Reaction Using Different Heterogeneous Catalyst Systems: The Role of Support
Author(s) -
Firuzabadi Fahimeh Dehghani,
Asadi Zahra
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
chemistryselect
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.437
H-Index - 34
ISSN - 2365-6549
DOI - 10.1002/slct.201801442
Subject(s) - catalysis , palladium , thermogravimetric analysis , x ray photoelectron spectroscopy , fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , nuclear chemistry , infrared spectroscopy , chemistry , scanning electron microscope , adsorption , inductively coupled plasma , spectroscopy , inorganic chemistry , materials science , chemical engineering , organic chemistry , plasma , physics , quantum mechanics , engineering , composite material
Palladium complex of 2‐(diphenylphosphino)benzaldehyde (P,N‐ligand) was immobilized on three different amino functionalized supports such as MCM‐41, SBA‐16, and Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles (NPs) to evaluate their catalytic activity toward O‐arylation reaction. Catalytic results showed that P,N−Pd‐MCM‐41 catalyst exhibited much higher activity than the other two catalysts due to the higher active surface sites and could be reused for several runs without significant loss in its catalytic activity. Notably, the reaction was done under solvent‐free condition which is important from the green chemistry point of view. The catalysts were characterized by different techniques including X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FT‐IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), transmission electron micrograph (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS), elemental analysis (CHN), inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy, and N 2 adsorption–desorption analysis.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here