Premium
Accounting for a decaying correlation structure in cluster randomized trials with continuous recruitment
Author(s) -
Grantham Kelsey L.,
Kasza Jessica,
Heritier Stephane,
Hemming Karla,
Forbes Andrew B.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.8089
Subject(s) - correlation , sample size determination , statistics , estimator , cluster (spacecraft) , crts , mathematics , variance (accounting) , context (archaeology) , computer science , paleontology , geometry , computer graphics (images) , accounting , business , biology , programming language
A requirement for calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials (CRTs) conducted over multiple periods of time is the specification of a form for the correlation between outcomes of subjects within the same cluster, encoded via the within‐cluster correlation structure. Previously proposed within‐cluster correlation structures have made strong assumptions; for example, the usual assumption is that correlations between the outcomes of all pairs of subjects are identical (“uniform correlation”). More recently, structures that allow for a decay in correlation between pairs of outcomes measured in different periods have been suggested. However, these structures are overly simple in settings with continuous recruitment and measurement. We propose a more realistic “continuous‐time correlation decay” structure whereby correlations between subjects' outcomes decay as the time between these subjects' measurement times increases. We investigate the use of this structure on trial planning in the context of a primary care diabetes trial, where there is evidence of decaying correlation between pairs of patients' outcomes over time. In particular, for a range of different trial designs, we derive the variance of the treatment effect estimator under continuous‐time correlation decay and compare this to the variance obtained under uniform correlation. For stepped wedge and cluster randomized crossover designs, incorrectly assuming uniform correlation will underestimate the required sample size under most trial configurations likely to occur in practice. Planning of CRTs requires consideration of the most appropriate within‐cluster correlation structure to obtain a suitable sample size.