Premium
Comparison of median survival times with adjustment for covariates
Author(s) -
Karrison Theodore
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.4780142304
Subject(s) - covariate , confidence interval , statistics , mathematics , kaplan–meier estimator , population , survival analysis , proportional hazards model , test statistic , statistical hypothesis testing , medicine , environmental health
Brookmeyer and Crowley derived a non‐parametric confidence interval for the median survival time of a homogeneous population by inverting a generalization of the sign test for censored data. The 1 – α confidence interval for the median is essentially the set of all values t such that the Kaplan—Meier estimate of the survival curve at time t does not differ significantly from one‐half at the two‐sided α level. Su and Wei extended this approach to the two‐sample problem and derived a confidence interval for the difference in median survival times based on the Kaplan‐Meier estimates of the individual survival curves and a ‘minimum dispersion’ test statistic. Here, I incorporate covariates into the analysis by assuming a proportional hazards model for the covariate effects, while leaving the two underlying survival curves virtually unconstrained. I generate a simultaneous confidence region for the two median survival times, adjusted to any selected value, z , of the covariate vector using a test‐based approach analogous to Brookmeyer and Crowley's for the one‐sample case. This region is, in turn, used to derive a confidence interval for the difference in median survival times between the two treatment groups at the selected value of z . Employment of a procedure suggested by Aitchison sets the level of the simultaneous region to a value that should yield, at least approximately, the desired confidence coefficient for the difference in medians. Simulation studies indicate that the method provides reasonably accurate coverage probabilities.