z-logo
Premium
Examining neighbourhood confounding in a survey: An example using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II
Author(s) -
Korn Edward L.,
Graubard Barry I.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.4780071009
Subject(s) - confounding , neighbourhood (mathematics) , national health and nutrition examination survey , matching (statistics) , environmental health , medicine , statistics , demography , population , mathematics , sociology , mathematical analysis
This paper demonstrates a methodology for examining whether neighbourhood stratification lessens the confounding bias of some specific risk‐factor/disease associations in analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II (NHANES II). The fortuitous clustering of the sample design of NHANES allows us to estimate risk‐factor/disease associations with and without controlling for neighbourhood effects on the same population. We briefly discuss the implications of this methodology for neighbourhood matching in case‐control studies.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here