Premium
Sample size and power for case‐control studies when exposures are continuous
Author(s) -
Lubin Jay H.,
Gail Mitchell H.,
Ershow Abby G.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.4780070302
Subject(s) - statistics , sample size determination , odds , statistic , covariate , odds ratio , mathematics , econometrics , logistic regression , medicine , demography , sociology
In estimating the sample size for a case‐control study, epidemiologic texts present formulae that require a binary exposure of interest. Frequently, however, important exposures are continuous and dichotomization may result in a ‘not exposed’ category that has little practical meaning. In addition, if risks vary monotonically with exposure, then dichotomization will obscure risk effects and require a greater number of subjects to detect differences in the exposure distributions among cases and controls. Starting from the usual score statistic to detect differences in exposure, this paper develops sample size formulae for case‐control studies with arbitrary exposure distributions; this includes both continuous and dichotomous exposure measurements as special cases. The score statistic is appropriate for general differentiable models for the relative odds, and, in particular, for the two forms commonly used in prospective disease occurrence models: (1) the odds of disease increase linearly with exposure; or (2) the odds increase exponentially with exposure. Under these two models we illustrate calculation of sample sizes for a hypothetical case‐control study of lung cancer among non‐smokers who are exposed to radon decay products at home.