z-logo
Premium
On the covariance of two correlated log‐odds ratios
Author(s) -
Bagos Pantelis G.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.4474
Subject(s) - covariance , odds , simple (philosophy) , statistics , computer science , analysis of covariance , covariance intersection , sample size determination , odds ratio , sample (material) , mathematics , estimation of covariance matrices , econometrics , algorithm , logistic regression , chemistry , epistemology , chromatography , philosophy
In many applications two correlated estimates of an effect size need to be considered simultaneously to be combined or compared. Apparently, there is a need for calculating their covariance, which however requires access to the individual data that may not be available to a researcher performing the analysis. We present a simple and efficient method for calculating the covariance of two correlated log‐odds ratios. The method is very simple, is based on the well‐known large sample approximations, can be applied using only data that are available in the published reports and more importantly, is very general, because it is shown to encompass several previously derived estimates (multiple outcomes, multiple treatments, dose–response models, mutually exclusive outcomes, genetic association studies) as special cases. By encompassing the previous approaches in a unified framework, the method allows easily deriving estimates for the covariance concerning problems that were not easy to be obtained otherwise. We show that the method can be used to derive the covariance of log‐odds ratios from matched and unmatched case‐control studies that use the same cases, a situation that has been addressed in the past only using individual data. Future applications of the method are discussed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here