z-logo
Premium
Analyzing direct and indirect effects of treatment using dynamic path analysis applied to data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study
Author(s) -
Røysland Kjetil,
Gran Jon Michael,
Ledergerber Bruno,
Wyl Viktor,
Young James,
Aalen Odd O.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.4324
Subject(s) - covariate , confounding , path analysis (statistics) , proportional hazards model , statistics , cohort , econometrics , survival analysis , cohort study , regression analysis , path (computing) , medicine , computer science , mathematics , programming language
When applying survival analysis, such as Cox regression, to data from major clinical trials or other studies, often only baseline covariates are used. This is typically the case even if updated covariates are available throughout the observation period, which leaves large amounts of information unused. The main reason for this is that such time‐dependent covariates often are internal to the disease process, as they are influenced by treatment, and therefore lead to confounded estimates of the treatment effect. There are, however, methods to exploit such covariate information in a useful way. We study the method of dynamic path analysis applied to data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. To adjust for time‐dependent confounding between treatment and the outcome ‘AIDS or death’, we carried out the analysis on a sequence of mimicked randomized trials constructed from the original cohort data. To analyze these trials together, regular dynamic path analysis is extended to a composite analysis of weighted dynamic path models. Results using a simple path model, with one indirect effect mediated through current HIV‐1 RNA level, show that most or all of the total effect go through HIV‐1 RNA for the first 4 years. A similar model, but with CD4 level as mediating variable, shows a weaker indirect effect, but the results are in the same direction. There are many reasons to be cautious when drawing conclusions from estimates of direct and indirect effects. Dynamic path analysis is however a useful tool to explore underlying processes, which are ignored in regular analyses. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here