z-logo
Premium
Accounting for bias due to a non‐ignorable tracing mechanism in a retrospective breast cancer cohort study
Author(s) -
Titman Andrew C.,
Lancaster Gillian A.,
Carmichael Katie,
Scutt Diane
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.4118
Subject(s) - truncation (statistics) , statistics , breast cancer , retrospective cohort study , tracing , cohort , markov chain , piecewise , econometrics , computer science , medicine , mathematics , cancer , mathematical analysis , operating system
We consider the analysis of competing risks in a retrospective breast cancer cohort study where tracing of patients is dependent on survival to a pre‐specified truncation time. We demonstrate that if ignored, the observed cause‐specific hazards will become distorted before the truncation time. Two approaches to account for the tracing bias are considered. First, a likelihood‐based method using piecewise constant transition intensities under a Markov assumption. Second, a pseudo‐likelihood method using inverse probability of tracing weights. For the breast cancer example, both methods improve the precision of estimates compared with a conventional approach based on excluding patients. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom