z-logo
Premium
Interval estimation of risk difference for data sampled from clusters
Author(s) -
Paul Sudhir R.,
Zaihra Tasneem
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.3289
Subject(s) - estimator , statistics , confidence interval , mathematics , cluster (spacecraft) , variance (accounting) , cluster sampling , sample size determination , coverage probability , interval estimation , sampling (signal processing) , computer science , econometrics , population , demography , accounting , filter (signal processing) , business , computer vision , programming language , sociology
Risk difference (RD) is an important measure in epidemiological studies where the probability of developing a disease for individuals in an exposed group, for example, is compared with that in a control group. There are varying cluster sizes in each group and the binary responses within each cluster cannot be assumed independent. Under the cluster sampling scenario, Lui ( Statistical Estimation of Epidemiological Risk . Wiley: CA, 2004; 7–27) discusses four methods for the construction of a confidence interval for the RD. In this paper we introduce two very simple methods. One method is based on an estimator of the variance of a ratio estimator ( Sampling Techniques (3rd edn). Wiley: New York, 1977; 30–67) and the other method is based on a sandwich estimator of the variance of the regression estimator using the generalized estimating equations approach of Zeger and Liang ( Biometrics 1986; 42 :121–130). These two methods are then compared, by simulation, in terms of maintaining nominal coverage probability and average coverage length, with the four methods discussed by Lui ( Statistical Estimation of Epidemiological Risk . Wiley: CA, 2004; 7–27). Simulations show at least as good properties of these two methods as those of the others. The method based on an estimate of the variance of a ratio estimator performs best overall. It involves a very simple variance expression and can be implemented with a very few computer codes. Therefore, it can be considered as an easily implementable alternative. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom