Premium
Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data
Author(s) -
Simmonds M. C.,
Higgins J. P. T.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.2768
Subject(s) - covariate , meta regression , econometrics , statistics , meta analysis , regression analysis , statistical power , regression , computer science , mathematics , medicine
Meta‐analyses of clinical trials are increasingly seeking to go beyond estimating the effect of a treatment and may also aim to investigate the effect of other covariates and how they alter treatment effectiveness. This requires the estimation of treatment‐covariate interactions. Meta‐regression can be used to estimate such interactions using published data, but it is known to lack statistical power, and is prone to bias. The use of individual patient data can improve estimation of such interactions, among other benefits, but it can be difficult and time‐consuming to collect and analyse. This paper derives, under certain conditions, the power of meta‐regression and IPD methods to detect treatment–covariate interactions. These power formulae are shown to depend on heterogeneity in the covariate distributions across studies. This allows the derivation of simple tests, based on heterogeneity statistics, for comparing the statistical power of the analysis methods. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.