Premium
Investigating heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta‐analysis of time to event outcomes
Author(s) -
Smith Catrin Tudur,
Williamson Paula R.,
Marson Anthony G.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.2050
Subject(s) - covariate , meta analysis , context (archaeology) , econometrics , computer science , multilevel model , aggregate (composite) , aggregate data , regression analysis , random effects model , event (particle physics) , statistics , medicine , machine learning , mathematics , paleontology , materials science , physics , quantum mechanics , composite material , biology
Differences across studies in terms of design features and methodology, clinical procedures, and patient characteristics, are factors that can contribute to variability in the treatment effect between studies in a meta‐analysis (statistical heterogeneity). Regression modelling can be used to examine relationships between treatment effect and covariates with the aim of explaining the variability in terms of clinical, methodological, or other factors. Such an investigation can be undertaken using aggregate data or individual patient data. An aggregate data approach can be problematic as sufficient data are rarely available and translating aggregate effects to individual patients can often be misleading. An individual patient data approach, although usually more resource demanding, allows a more thorough investigation of potential sources of heterogeneity and enables a fuller analysis of time to event outcomes in meta‐analysis. Hierarchical Cox regression models are used to identify and explore the evidence for heterogeneity in meta‐analysis and examine the relationship between covariates and censored failure time data in this context. Alternative formulations of the model are possible and illustrated using individual patient data from a meta‐analysis of five randomized controlled trials which compare two drugs for the treatment of epilepsy. The models are further applied to simulated data examples in which the degree of heterogeneity and magnitude of treatment effect are varied. The behaviour of each model in each situation is explored and compared. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.