Premium
Quantifying and comparing the accuracy of binary biomarkers when predicting a failure time outcome
Author(s) -
Moskowitz Chaya S.,
Pepe Margaret S.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
statistics in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.996
H-Index - 183
eISSN - 1097-0258
pISSN - 0277-6715
DOI - 10.1002/sim.1747
Subject(s) - outcome (game theory) , computer science , statistics , binary number , mathematics , mathematical economics , arithmetic
The positive and negative predictive values are standard measures used to quantify the predictive accuracy of binary biomarkers when the outcome being predicted is also binary. When the biomarkers are instead being used to predict a failure time outcome, there is no standard way of quantifying predictive accuracy. We propose a natural extension of the traditional predictive values to accommodate censored survival data. We discuss not only quantifying predictive accuracy using these extended predictive values, but also rigorously comparing the accuracy of two biomarkers in terms of their predictive values. Using a marginal regression framework, we describe how to estimate differences in predictive accuracy and how to test whether the observed difference is statistically significant. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.