z-logo
Premium
Quantifying data from Auger spectra and images
Author(s) -
Walker C. G. H.,
Peacock D. C.,
Prutton M.,
El Gomati M. M.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
surface and interface analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.52
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1096-9918
pISSN - 0142-2421
DOI - 10.1002/sia.740110507
Subject(s) - auger , auger electron spectroscopy , spectral line , computer science , optics , pixel , sample (material) , thin film , surface (topology) , materials science , algorithm , computational physics , physics , mathematics , atomic physics , nanotechnology , astronomy , nuclear physics , geometry , thermodynamics
A method for quantifying Auger spectra and including matrix effects is described. This method corrects iteratively for the effects of electron back‐scattering, the inelastic mean free path and atomic density in the sample using established methods. New algorithms have been developed to assist the user interactively with the analysis of spectra collected from surfaces covered by thin films of unknown composition or thickness, or by coverage of another material. Error analysis has been included for both homogeneous and thin film cases. A ‘figure of merit’, used to inform the user if a thin film model of the surface is accurate, is introduced. The algorithms can be implemented on a small microcomputer. Their application to quantitative Auger analysis by multi‐spectral imaging is also described. Each point in a set of images has been corrected for the factors that influence the Auger current to arrive at surface compositions at each pixel for each element. Some of the advantages and problems of quantifying Auger images will be outlined. The use of multi‐spectral Auger images is seen as a powerful means of identifying surface phases of materials and is given the acronym MULSAM— MUL ti‐ S pectral‐ A uger M apping.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here