Premium
Differentiating calcium carbonate polymorphs by surface analysis techniques—an XPS and TOF‐SIMS study
Author(s) -
Ni Ming,
Ratner Buddy D.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
surface and interface analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.52
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1096-9918
pISSN - 0142-2421
DOI - 10.1002/sia.2904
Subject(s) - vaterite , calcium carbonate , aragonite , calcite , x ray photoelectron spectroscopy , chemistry , secondary ion mass spectrometry , fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , carbonate , biomineralization , analytical chemistry (journal) , crystallography , mineralogy , mass spectrometry , chemical engineering , organic chemistry , chromatography , engineering
Calcium carbonate has evoked interest owing to its use as a biomaterial, and for its potential in biomineralization. Three polymorphs of calcium carbonate, i.e. calcite, aragonite, and vaterite were synthesized. Three conventional bulk analysis techniques, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and SEM, were used to confirm the crystal phase of each polymorphic calcium carbonate. Two surface analysis techniques, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy (TOF‐SIMS), were used to differentiate the surfaces of these three polymorphs of calcium carbonate. XPS results clearly demonstrate that the surfaces of these three polymorphs are different as seen in the Ca(2p) and O(1s) core‐level spectra. The different atomic arrangement in the crystal lattice, which provides for a different chemical environment, can explain this surface difference. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to analyze the TOF‐SIMS data. Three polymorphs of calcium carbonate cluster into three different groups by PCA scores. This suggests that surface analysis techniques are as powerful as conventional bulk analysis to discriminate calcium carbonate polymorphs. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.