z-logo
Premium
Thermal evolution of Co islands on Ag/Si(111)‐√3 × √3 and Ag/Ge(111)‐√3 × √3 surfaces
Author(s) -
Tsay SungLin,
Kuo ChangYu,
Lin ChunLiang,
Chen WenChen,
Fu TsuYi
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
surface and interface analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.52
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1096-9918
pISSN - 0142-2421
DOI - 10.1002/sia.2897
Subject(s) - scanning tunneling microscope , crystallography , annealing (glass) , nucleation , low energy electron diffraction , trimer , electron diffraction , alloy , chemistry , materials science , diffraction , nanotechnology , dimer , metallurgy , optics , physics , organic chemistry
Thermal evolution of Co islands on Ag/Ge(111)‐√3 × √3 and Ag/Si(111)‐√3 × √3 surfaces was studied by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and low‐energy electron diffraction (LEED). Ag‐√3 × √3 buffer layer can avoid alloy formation of Co and Si or Ge below the annealing temperature 500 °C. The growth behavior of Co on Ag/Si(111)‐√3 × √3 surfaces is very different from that on Ag/Ge(111)‐√3 × √3 surfaces, although both the √3 structures can be classified as honeycomb chain trimer (HCT) model. Submonolayer Co on Ag/Si(111)‐√3 × √3 surfaces prefer to form clusters below 500 °C. However, Co clusters nucleate and construct two‐dimensional islands (2D islands) on Ag/Ge(111)‐√3 × √3 surfaces after annealing to 300 °C. The result of different growth behavior comes from two major factors. One is antiphase boundaries (APBs) with extra electron states, which trap Co clusters on Ag/Si(111)‐√3 × √3 surfaces. The other is the strong binding force that exists between Ge and Co atoms to cause the formation of Co period islands on Ag/Ge(111)‐√3 × √3 surfaces. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom