z-logo
Premium
Comment on ‘AES and SAM microanalysis of structure ceramics by thinning and coating the backside. Yu and Jin’
Author(s) -
Paparazzo E.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
surface and interface analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.52
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 1096-9918
pISSN - 0142-2421
DOI - 10.1002/sia.1144
Subject(s) - auger , microanalysis , auger electron spectroscopy , chemistry , characterization (materials science) , ceramic , analytical chemistry (journal) , ion , scanning electron microscope , chemical state , coating , chemical composition , nanotechnology , mineralogy , materials science , chemical engineering , atomic physics , composite material , nuclear physics , physics , organic chemistry , chromatography , x ray photoelectron spectroscopy , engineering
A paper by Yu and Jin ( Surf. Interface Anal. 2001; 31: 338) describing Auger microanalysis of ceramic insulating materials is commented upon. The major criticism regards the authors' claim that reliable scanning Auger microscopy (SAM) analysis can be performed on the (Y,La)‐doped α‐Si 3 N 4 sample when this is made thinner by dimpling and Ar + ion etching, two procedures that prevent surface charging phenomena. In fact, this comment shows that: Ar + ion bombardment produces insurgence of Si–Si bonding states as a result of chemical reduction of surface Si x N y O z species, so that no chemical‐state information actually can be derived from the Si LVV and Si KLL spectra of this sample because the layers probed by Auger analysis are not very reminiscent of the genuine chemical composition of this material; and SAM imaging results obtained from the same material are heavily affected by topographical artefacts and no reliable information thus can be derived from its true microchemical surface lateral heterogeneity. It is suggested that the use of reflected electron energy‐loss microscopy, i.e. a technique that is in itself immune to surface charging phenomena, would have been likely to assist better than SAM in the microchemical characterization of insulating materials. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here