Premium
Winner‐take‐all or long tail? A behavioral model of markets with increasing returns
Author(s) -
Lamberson P.J.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
system dynamics review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.491
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1099-1727
pISSN - 0883-7066
DOI - 10.1002/sdr.1563
Subject(s) - outcome (game theory) , heuristic , simple (philosophy) , range (aeronautics) , market share , set (abstract data type) , distribution (mathematics) , market power , economics , computer science , microeconomics , behavioral modeling , econometrics , mathematical optimization , artificial intelligence , engineering , mathematics , mathematical analysis , philosophy , programming language , epistemology , finance , monopoly , aerospace engineering
This paper develops a model of consumer choice that demonstrates why some markets with increasing returns converge to a winner‐take‐all outcome while many others have a power law market share distribution with a “long tail” of small‐share products. The model takes the standard winner‐take‐all model of increasing returns and adds a simple behavioral assumption: when faced with complex choices, decision makers first quickly eliminate many of the available options using a simple heuristic before selecting from the remaining feasible set . We examine the market‐level consequences of this model using an agent‐based simulation. Under a wide range of parameters the model produces a power law share distribution. But when consumers have very large feasible sets the market converges to a winner‐take‐all outcome, and when consumers have very small feasible sets the model produces an evenly split market. Copyright © 2017 System Dynamics Society
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom