z-logo
Premium
Students' mechanistic reasoning in practice: Enabling functions of drawing, gestures and talk
Author(s) -
Andrade Vanessa,
Shwartz Yael,
Freire Sofia,
Baptista Mónica
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
science education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.209
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1098-237X
pISSN - 0036-8326
DOI - 10.1002/sce.21685
Subject(s) - embodied cognition , spatial intelligence , cognition , cognitive science , mechanism (biology) , action (physics) , dimension (graph theory) , process (computing) , curriculum , qualitative reasoning , deductive reasoning , computer science , mathematics education , psychology , epistemology , artificial intelligence , pedagogy , pure mathematics , operating system , philosophy , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , neuroscience
Abstract Mechanistic reasoning is a powerful form of reasoning central to scientific explanations. Despite mechanistic reasoning being an important dimension of scientific practice and a central dimension of science curricula, students face difficulties in developing such type of reasoning. Many authors have been proposing tools for supporting its development; drawing is one such tool. Studies that purposefully explore how drawing leverages and supports students' mechanistic reasoning while engage in a process of constructing explanations are still scarce. The goal of the current study was to understand how students' mechanistic reasoning emerges and is enacted when students are jointly involved in drawing creation. For that, we drew on a recent framework that identifies essential characteristics of students' mechanistic reasoning and also on theories of distributed and embodied cognition. In this paper, we present a pair of middle school students who jointly explain a chemical phenomenon by creating drawings and reasoning with them. Using a fine‐grain analysis we examined the elements of students' mechanistic reasoning in relation to drawing creation and how talk and embodied actions on and with the drawings were used to support students' reasoning. Findings reveal that drawings played a key role in paving the way for students reasoning about mechanisms and in enacting mechanistic reasoning. In particular, drawings were essential for pushing students to look for a mechanism, for enabling and supporting mechanistic reasoning‐in‐action, and for facilitating productive interactions between the students that ended up in the construction of a sophisticated mechanistic explanation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here