z-logo
Premium
Fostering sustainable improvements in science education: An analysis through four frames
Author(s) -
Reinholz Daniel L.,
Ngai Courtney,
Quan Gina,
Pilgrim Mary E.,
Corbo Joel C.,
Finkelstein Noah
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
science education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.209
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1098-237X
pISSN - 0036-8326
DOI - 10.1002/sce.21526
Subject(s) - sustainability , documentation , science education , engineering ethics , sociology , education for sustainable development , sustainability science , sustainable development , culture change , pedagogy , political science , social science , social sustainability , engineering , computer science , ecology , law , biology , programming language
There is a pressing need to improve the sustainability of educational improvement efforts, but sustainability remains undertheorized in science education. In this article, we draw upon frameworks from organizational culture and sustainability to characterize change within a single undergraduate science department. This in‐depth longitudinal case study over 15 years provides careful documentation of the types of changes that are required to make improvements over time. In particular, we argue that cultural shifts are an important aspect of sustainable improvements. As we show, even a department that was considered an educational improvement “success story” was unable to sustain the improvements made through its initial effort. Nonetheless, we do argue that the initial effort resulted in shifts to multiple aspects of the department's culture (e.g., ways of thinking, the status of education in the department), that we characterize with Bolman and Deal's four frames. These cultural shifts provided the groundwork for a later effort, to ultimately create sustainable structures in the department resulting in sustained improvement. To conclude, we provide recommendations for how to improve the sustainability of change efforts and describe important methodological considerations for future studies of sustainability.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here