z-logo
Premium
Urban primary‐grade children think and talk science: Curricular and instructional practices that nurture participation and argumentation
Author(s) -
Varelas Maria,
Pappas Christine C.,
Kane Justine M.,
Arsenault Amy,
Hankes Jennifer,
Cowan Begoña Marnotes
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
science education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.209
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1098-237X
pISSN - 0036-8326
DOI - 10.1002/sce.20232
Subject(s) - argumentation theory , science education , meaning (existential) , meaning making , pedagogy , nature versus nurture , ambiguity , psychology , reading (process) , philosophy for children , mathematics education , sociology , epistemology , linguistics , philosophy , anthropology , psychotherapist
We focus on the concept of matter and explore how young children in urban schools bridge their spontaneous concepts and everyday experiences with scientific concepts introduced to them by children's literature information books and their teacher. The study shows how material artifacts used in a sorting activity became ideational tools—semiotic devices that promoted children's engagement with science and shaped the classroom discourse, thinking, and transactions. “Ambiguous” objects, such as a baggie with air, shaving cream, a baggie of salt that children were asked to sort, encouraged them to debate ideas about states of matter. Children used four ways of reasoning about states of matter: macroscopic properties, prototypes, everyday functions, and process of elimination. Furthermore, children's meaning making was intertwined with various socio‐organizational aspects of inquiry—the ways in which children negotiated their roles within their group and in whole‐class sessions, how they worked with each other, how their ideas were heard by others. We discuss how curricular and instructional approaches that do not lead children to one specific answer or way of thinking become catalysts for the creation of discursive spaces, where children and teacher engage in meaning making in the midst of ambiguity and confusion. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci. Ed 92 :65–95, 2008

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here