z-logo
Premium
How much curriculum change is appropriate? Defining a zone of feasible innovation
Author(s) -
Rogan John M.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
science education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.209
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1098-237X
pISSN - 0036-8326
DOI - 10.1002/sce.20192
Subject(s) - dilemma , scope (computer science) , context (archaeology) , curriculum , promotion (chess) , frame (networking) , sociology , balance (ability) , science education , curriculum development , epistemology , pedagogy , mathematics education , engineering ethics , psychology , computer science , political science , engineering , philosophy , telecommunications , neuroscience , politics , law , paleontology , biology , programming language
The article grapples with the question of how much curriculum change is appropriate in a given context and in a given time frame. How can a balance be struck between stagnation, on the one hand, and the promotion of unrealistic innovation on the other? In answer to this dilemma, the concept of a zone of feasible innovation (ZFI) is proposed and explored, drawing on the literature of school development, teacher professional development, and of developmental psychology, the work of Vygotsky in particular. A series of procedures are suggested to help define the nature and scope of a ZFI in any given situation. Finally, vignettes from case studies of innovation in science education are evoked to provide real‐life counterpoints to the theoretical constructs of the literature. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed , 91: 439–460, 2007

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom