z-logo
Premium
Evolution of the conceptions of a secondary education biology teacher: Longitudinal analysis using cognitive maps
Author(s) -
DaSilva Consuelo,
Mellado Vicente,
Ruiz Constantino,
Porlán Rafael
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
science education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.209
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1098-237X
pISSN - 0036-8326
DOI - 10.1002/sce.20183
Subject(s) - mathematics education , science education , cognition , psychology , teaching method , conceptual change , coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) , longitudinal study , nature of science , pedagogy , epistemology , sociology , philosophy , mathematics , statistics , neuroscience
We describe a longitudinal study of a secondary education biology teacher at two moments in her career (1993–2002), determining the changes in her conceptions of the nature of science and its teaching and learning, and the factors that favored or hindered such changes. The changes were analyzed using cognitive maps, constructed on the basis of the Inventory of Teachers' Pedagogical & Scientific Beliefs (INPECIP) questionnaire, designed and validated by R. Porlán, A. Rivero, and R. Martín del Pozo (1997), and a semistructured interview. The results showed the process of change in conceptions to be complex and gradual, with different conceptions being out of phase with each other. During her first 4 years of teaching, until 1993, her conceptions of science teaching and learning began to evolve from a teacher and content‐centered model to one that was more student centered. The catalyst of the change in her initial conceptions of teaching and learning was her becoming aware of the students' alternative ideas. Her empiricist conception of the nature of science, however, remained practically unaltered during these first 4 years. This conception began to shift slowly toward less dogmatic and more up‐to‐date positions as a consequence of her changing view of teaching‐learning, and by 2002, there was again coherence between her scientific thinking and her ideas on science teaching and learning. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed , 91: 461–491, 2007

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here