z-logo
Premium
Describing teachers' conceptual ecologies for the nature of science
Author(s) -
Southerland Sherry A.,
Johnston Adam,
Sowell Scott
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
science education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.209
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1098-237X
pISSN - 0036-8326
DOI - 10.1002/sce.20153
Subject(s) - nature of science , construct (python library) , psychology , mathematics education , conceptual change , science education , conceptual framework , concept learning , disposition , pedagogy , affect (linguistics) , inclusion (mineral) , sociology , social psychology , social science , communication , computer science , programming language
This research focused on the interactionist conceptual ecologies of inservice teachers and how these ecologies influenced these teachers' conceptual frameworks for the nature of science (NOS). The participants in the study were five teachers enrolled in a graduate course focused on NOS. Data included participants' responses to open‐ended and Likert scale surveys, interviews, writing prompts, and participant observations of classroom sessions. We propose a model of the interaction of the prominent components of teachers' conceptual ecologies for NOS, one in which learning dispositions, understandings of the broad enterprise of science, and orientation to learning and learners are understood to shape teachers' conceptual frameworks for NOS. The complex ties between NOS conceptions and goals, affect, dispositions, and beliefs speak to the inclusion of the bounded nature of science as a central aspect of NOS for practicing teachers. Teachers' dispositions toward learning this construct are linked to their conceptions of the boundaries of science as well as their understanding of the role of NOS in their own teaching. We argue that a recognition of the bounded nature of science foregrounds actions of a teacher's learning disposition, thus potentially minimizing the influence of their religious beliefs. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 90 :874–96, 2006

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here