Open AccessHigh‐temperature oxidation of nickel and chromium studied with an in‐situ environmental scanning electron microscope
Author(s) -
Schmid B.,
Aas N.,
Grong Ø.,
Ødegård R.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
scanning
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.359
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1932-8745
pISSN - 0161-0457
DOI - 10.1002/sca.4950230406
Subject(s) - environmental scanning electron microscope , oxide , chromium , scanning electron microscope , nickel , metal , materials science , oxygen , morphology (biology) , in situ , chemical engineering , metallurgy , chemistry , composite material , organic chemistry , biology , engineering , genetics
Investigations of the morphology of metal oxide scales formed at high temperatures in oxidative environments are usually undertaken after exposure of the samples is completed. In this study, an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) was used as a tool for the in‐situ observation of oxide scale formation. Pure nickel and chromium samples were oxidized at a temperature of 973 K in either pure oxygen or water vapour at a pressure of 667 Pa. The evolution of an oxide scale was followed in‐situ for up to 3 h. The morphology of the developing oxide scales was found to be a function of the metal substrate and the gaseous species. The growth mechanisms of the different metal oxide scales are reviewed and related to the analysed in‐situ images. Emphasis is placed on the relationship between oxidation mechanism and scale morphology. Nickel is seen to oxidise by outward diffusion of nickel probably on oxide grain boundaries when exposed to oxygen. Water vapour changes the scale morphology and a duplex‐type scale arises due to preferential overgrowth. The scale which develops due to chromium oxidation in oxygen is a fine‐grained, thin, and dense layer. In contrast, water vapour leads to whisker growth on chromium and an open, felt‐like structure forms. The applicability of the ESEM to the study of such systems is demonstrated, and its limitations are outlined. The results are encouraging examples of the possibilities which the in‐situ ESEM technique possesses.