z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Morphology and Amine Accessibility of (3‐Aminopropyl) Triethoxysilane Films on Glass Surfaces
Author(s) -
Wang Wei,
Vaughn Mark. W.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
scanning
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.359
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1932-8745
pISSN - 0161-0457
DOI - 10.1002/sca.20097
Subject(s) - triethoxysilane , silane , deposition (geology) , amine gas treating , materials science , phase (matter) , chemical engineering , rhodamine , aqueous solution , thin film , chemical vapor deposition , picric acid , chemistry , organic chemistry , fluorescence , nanotechnology , optics , paleontology , physics , sediment , engineering , biology
3‐Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES) is commonly used to functionalize glass substrates because it can form an amine‐reactive film that is tightly attached to the surface. In this study, we investigated the morphology and chemical reactivity of APTES films prepared on glass substrates using common deposition techniques. Films were prepared using concentrated vapor‐phase deposition, dilute vapor‐phase deposition, anhydrous organic‐phase deposition and aqueous‐phase deposition. All films were annealed, or cured, at 150 °C. The morphology of the films was quantified by fluorescence and by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The optical equivalent of the AFM images was computed and then used to directly compare optical and AFM images. Reactive amine density was determined by a picric acid assay and by a method that employed N ‐succinimidyl 3‐[2‐pyridyldithio]‐propionamido (SPDP) cross‐linked rhodamine. Fluorescence and AFM images showed that silane films prepared from dilute vapor‐phase and aqueous‐phase deposition were more uniform and had fewer domains than those deposited by the other methods. The ratio of picric acid‐accessible amino groups to SPDP cross‐linked rhodamine‐accessible groups varied with the preparation method, suggesting reactant size‐dependent difference in amine accessibility. We found a larger number of accessible amino groups on films prepared by vapor‐phase deposition than on those prepared from solution deposition. The dilute vapor‐phase deposition technique produced relatively few domains, and it should be a good choice for bioconjugation applications. There were appreciable differences in the films produced by each method. We suggest that these differences originate from differences in film rearrangement during annealing. SCANNING 30: 000–000, 2008. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here