Premium
Coupled support tensor machine classification for multimodal neuroimaging data
Author(s) -
Li Peide,
Sofuoglu Seyyid Emre,
Aviyente Selin,
Maiti Tapabrata
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
statistical analysis and data mining: the asa data science journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.381
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1932-1872
pISSN - 1932-1864
DOI - 10.1002/sam.11587
Subject(s) - computer science , artificial intelligence , machine learning , tensor (intrinsic definition) , matrix decomposition , classifier (uml) , pattern recognition (psychology) , data mining , mathematics , eigenvalues and eigenvectors , physics , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics
Multimodal data arise in various applications where information about the same phenomenon is acquired from multiple sensors and across different imaging modalities. Learning from multimodal data is of great interest in machine learning and statistics research as this offers the possibility of capturing complementary information among modalities. Multimodal modeling helps to explain the interdependence between heterogeneous data sources, discovers new insights that may not be available from a single modality, and improves decision‐making. Recently, coupled matrix–tensor factorization has been introduced for multimodal data fusion to jointly estimate latent factors and identify complex interdependence among the latent factors. However, most of the prior work on coupled matrix–tensor factors focuses on unsupervised learning and there is little work on supervised learning using the jointly estimated latent factors. This paper considers the multimodal tensor data classification problem. A coupled support tensor machine (C‐STM) built upon the latent factors jointly estimated from the advanced coupled matrix–tensor factorization is proposed. C‐STM combines individual and shared latent factors with multiple kernels and estimates a maximal‐margin classifier for coupled matrix–tensor data. The classification risk of C‐STM is shown to converge to the optimal Bayes risk, making it a statistically consistent rule. C‐STM is validated through simulation studies as well as a simultaneous analysis on electroencephalography with functional magnetic resonance imaging data. The empirical evidence shows that C‐STM can utilize information from multiple sources and provide a better classification performance than traditional single‐mode classifiers.