Open AccessRotational thromboelastometry in critically ill COVID ‐19 patients does not predict thrombosis
Author(s) -
Dujardin Romein W. G.,
Garcia Rosenbaum Gabriel,
Klercq Timo C. J.,
Thachil Jecko,
Nielsen Nathan D.,
Juffermans Nicole P.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2475-0379
DOI - 10.1002/rth2.12798
Subject(s) - thromboelastometry , medicine , receiver operating characteristic , intensive care unit , thrombosis , area under the curve , coagulopathy , logistic regression , retrospective cohort study , intensive care , anesthesia , venous thrombosis , intensive care medicine
Background Critically ill COVID‐19 patients are in a hypercoagulable state with increased risk of thrombotic complications. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a viscoelastic test with the potential to reflect COVID‐19‐associated hypercoagulability and may therefore be useful to predict thrombotic complications. Objective To investigate the potential of ROTEM profiles to predict thrombotic complications in critically ill COVID‐19 patients. Patients/Methods Retrospective multicenter cohort study in 113 adult patients with confirmed COVID‐19 infection admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of two large teaching hospitals in the United States and in the Netherlands. ROTEM profiles of the EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM tracings were measured within 72 h of ICU admission. Thrombotic complications encompass both arterial and venous thromboembolic complications, diagnosed with electrocardiogram, ultrasound, or computed tomography. ROTEM profiles were compared between patients with and without thrombosis. Univariable logistic regression followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was performed to identify ROTEM parameters associated with thrombosis. Results and Conclusions Of 113 patients, 27 (23.9%) developed a thrombotic event. In the univariable analysis, EXTEM clot amplitude at 10 min (CA10) and EXTEM maximum clot formation (MCF) were associated with thrombosis with a p < 0.2 ( p = 0.07 and p = 0.05, respectively). In ROC curve analysis, EXTEM CA10 had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.58 (95% CI 0.47–0.70) and EXTEM MCF had an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI 0.49–0.71). Thereby, ROTEM profiles at ICU admission did not have the potential to differentiate between patients with a high and low risk for thrombotic complications.