In vitro reversal of direct factor Xa inhibitors: Direct comparison of andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrates Cofact and Beriplex/Kcentra

Abstract Background Both andexanet alfa and four‐factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F‐PCC) are clinically applied reversal agents for direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs) in emergency situations. Controversy exists whether 4F‐PCC is as effective as andexanet alfa in correcting FXaI anticoagulation. Objective This in vitro study was designed to directly compare andexanet alfa with two different 4F‐PCCs (Cofact and Beriplex/Kcentra) in their ability to correct FXaI anticoagulation. Method Normal plasma was spiked with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Reversal of anticoagulation was assessed using a thrombin generation assay and a fibrin generation–clot lysis test. Results Andexanet alfa, applied at clinically recommended doses, was effective in restoring thrombin generation as evidenced by correction of thrombin generation lag time, peak thrombin, and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). Clotting time and clot resistance to fibrinolytic breakdown was corrected over the full range of applied FXaI (0–800 ng/ml). 4F‐PCC in increasing doses (0.625, 1.25 and 2 IU/ml; approximately 25, 50, and 80 IU/kg) only partially restored thrombin generation lag time and clotting time. Partial correction to overnormalization of peak thrombin and ETP was observed, depending on FXaI concentration and PCC dose. Clot resistance to fibrinolytic breakdown was dose‐dependently improved to above normal. Beriplex/Kcentra was consistently less effective than Cofact. Conclusion Both andexanet alfa and 4F‐PCC improved coagulation that is hampered by FXaIs. While andexanet alfa corrected all thrombin generation parameters, 4F‐PCC predominantly increased peak thrombin and ETP. Especially heparin‐free 4F‐PCC also improved clot stability against fibrinolytic breakdown. Beriplex/Kcentra contains heparin, and this may have caused reduced effectivity compared to Cofact.